A Pragma-Dialectical Study of David Hare’s ‘Stuff Happens
Keywords:
pragma-dialectical, speech acts and fallacies, analysisAbstract
This study analyzes David Hare’s play” Stuff Happens” from pragma-dialectical perspective. The study tries to approach the characters in the light of van Eemeren’s pragma-dialectical Model. The study is put to determine the most frequency fallacy committed by the characters of the plays and to show the most utilized speech acts and how these acts highlight the characters’ own personalities. The study concludes that the speech acts used in the play are an efficient tool in approaching the characters and the model of analysis used is workable on the data under analysis.
References
Cummings, L. (2010). The pragmatics encyclopedia. New York: Routledge.
Dridkasd, T. (2016). “A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Argumentative Discourse”. Khazar Journal
of Humanities and Social Sciences, 19 (4), 20-35.
Kneale, W., and Kneale, M. (1962). The development of logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Stydom, P. (2014). “Cross-Currents of Pragmatism and Pragmatics: A Sociological Perspective on
Practices and Forms”. IBA Journal of Management & Leadership 5(2), pp. 20-36.
van Eemeren, F. (2004(. A systematic theory of argumentation: the pragma-dialectical approach.
Cambridge: CUP.
van Eemeren, F. (2018). Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Springer
International Publishing AG.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC), the author (s) and users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution).
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
1. Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
2. the right to use the substance of the article in future works, including lectures and books,
3. the right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale,
4. the right to self-archive the article.